Platform · Evaluations
Evaluate responses consistently, defensibly, and fast.
Managing vendor sourcing is often messy and slow. Hazel keeps it organized so you can focus on choosing the right fit for your agency.
Problem & Solution
Evaluations
Evaluation committees drown in hundred-page proposals, and inconsistent scoring invites protests. Hazel helps teams structure evaluations against published criteria and utilizes AI to enforce citations and consistency for human raters. Your evaluations become more compliant, protest-proof, higher-quality, and structured.

How it works
From solicitation to evaluation to consensus.
- Step 01
Set up from the solicitation
Hazel builds the evaluation structure directly from your published criteria and weights, so the evaluation matches what vendors were told.
- Step 02
Ensure vendor responsiveness
Automated checks confirm each submission meets the solicitation's requirements, such as page limits, required forms, and mandatory certifications. Responsiveness is visible at a glance before evaluators open a single proposal.
- Step 03
Evaluate with evidence
Evaluators review proposals with every relevant passage surfaced and linked. Ratings are tied to citations and structured comments.
- Step 04
Reach consensus
Scores, comments, and disagreements are organized for the consensus discussion. On platform, not in messy spreadsheets.
- Step 05
Export the record
One complete, organized evaluation record: criteria, scores, justifications, and sources, fitted to your processes and ready for debriefs, audits, or protests.
Story from a Customer
From 30 days to roughly two
A federal agency demonstrated a credible path from 30-day technical evaluations to roughly two, with every judgment still made by a human reviewer.
Read the federal agency case studyCompliance & trust
Hazel doesn't score proposals, rank vendors autonomously, or replace the judgment of your evaluation committee. We organize the evidence so that judgment is quicker to exercise and easier to defend.